Monthly Archives: February 2018

Regina’s Reflection

I liked reading about Wendy Luttrell’s research because it was done in such a formal and controlled way.  This is not how I will be doing my research–so it’s nice to see the other side!

I think the variety of data she collected during both her photography ethnographic study and her “Fertile Bodies” ethnographic study were what made both so informative.  Not only did she have the work products of all participants–she also had video and audio recordings of interviews, conversations, and work sessions.  Her articles features transcriptions of these conversations or dialogue more heavily than the actual art products, and that seems really telling.  It must have taken so much time to record and transcribe every class session, but it’s what allowed her to come to such rich understandings.

These articles made me think about how art is just a conduit for understanding. Like, art is more about how someone makes the art because it helps you understand trends (data) and make meaning of their experiences (ethnography). Luttrell was paying attention to what the students talked about while making and presenting their art. This discussion of the art is just a different phase of meaning-making.  I’m struck by how much meaning can be gleaned (or has been gleaned) from just watching someone make art.

Overall, I think I have two next steps: 1) I’m going to be to film myself making my collages.  I can see the arranging and rearranging process as potentially being informative.  I would like to film it from above and have just my hands and the paper in the frame. 2) I need to start thinking about my students as human beings who have a completely separate life outside of school.  The articles about Luttrell’s photography research made me realize that there’s a whole lot about my students that I don’t know.   And changing my thinking could help me become a better teacher.

Lauren’s Journal Entry 4

So much of Wendy Luttrell’s work resonated with me that I almost find it difficult to begin this entry. We share an interest in the space where image, voice and narrative intersect and how that space supports identity formation during the “between” moments of human life. We also agree this is important work that can be used to inform teacher practice and teacher development by acknowledging additional ways of knowing.

Her work in an urban elementary school, as she recounts in ‘A camera is a big responsibility’: a lens for analysing children’s visual voices, raises some significant points with regard to working with children in arts-based research. She highlights the challenge of “finding the line between children’s voices and those of adult researchers, who see to represent them.” The researcher unassumingly becomes the curator by making decisions on the information that is included or perhaps by the types of question prompts that are posed. While there may not be a way to remove the fingerprints, it speaks to a mindfulness of (and commitment to) the integrity of a child’s voice.

Littrell moved through this study with minimal restrictions or adult guidance. In the true spirit of photography, it is an exploration. This is something I’ve thought about a lot over the past few days in terms of my own work. While migration is the catalyst of identity schisms for all of the students I work with, I wonder if it is too restrictive. What if the themes were broader and more universal? I wonder where children might take us if given a camera to capture feelings of exclusion…and then belonging. I wonder what that voice might say, not only about individual experience, but also about society. What cultural and ideological conventions could we infer?

As part of Luttrell’s methodology of working with child photographers, debrief interviews were voice recorded and video taped. I find that this really elevates the research process to a form of analysis itself. Both types of recordings provide a richness that goes beyond word choice and delves deeper into values (listening for care) and the interactions between how they see themselves and how they want to be seen (interacting with the video camera). I am considering how I will record the interactions I will have with the student I am working with this semester.

Picture That – Shawn Brown

Professor Fellner
Art-based Instruction
2/27/2018
Shawn Brown
Picture That

The importance of ensuring that children’s voices are heard authentically cannot be understated. As a child, I spoke through drawing. It was an instrument that I used to express emotions, thoughts, and interests. My dad was incarcerated for approximately 13 years. He would draw pictures, frame them, and send them to me as a gift. The pictures usually came with a note. My dad has the most elegant penmanship I’ve ever seen. I was more interested in the artwork rather than the writing. He would draw himself as a towering, muscular figure with a gold chain, shell-toe Adidas sneakers, and lots of money in his pockets. In retrospect, I realize that this is how he may have envisioned himself if he were free. As time passed, the artwork became more elaborate. He would draw cars, money, expensive clothes, etc. In return, I would draw something as well. In many ways, this is where my love for the arts and writing began. His photos also spoke to me in a way that his artwork could not.
My first memories of my father were photos. I saw contradictory images of him smiling while wearing prison uniforms. Was there a hidden joy about being in prison? Luttrell’s work seems to illuminate how audiences elicit multiple meanings from photos. My father later informed me of his desire to communicate his safety and security. The pictures that we select to express joy, pride, and dignity may convey something entirely different to another person. The audience’s interpretation differs leading to more reflexive, analytically dialog. One’s ethnicity and socio-economic background effects what images are used. Photography can capture subtle nuances that can never be express through words or art.
This historical form of qualitative research is especially crucial for marginalized groups. Dubois’ earlier work in 1923 displayed images of Blacks in natural settings. Images of Blacks that still resonate with me are Malcolm X at the window, Rosa Parks on the bus, and Emmit Till’s decaying body, etc. These images tell stories that cannot be easily explained. I hold on to them to counter current narratives of Blackness in the media. The power of allowing children to tell their own stories provides authentic data. Adults via adultism force children to position themselves according to societal directives, rules, and regulations.
The pictures of a family album, though a created illusion, is telling of a child’s family structure. I think of the imbalance of images in my family’s collection. Pictures of my mother and two brothers parallel photos of my dad in prison. Photos have the power to divide or unite. In Luttrell’s writing, stuffed animals are symbolic of the power of photos to unity different people. One girl resided in a housing project, another in a three-decker home. Both girls spoke of cherishing their dolls. Collaboratively seeing and developing bifocality has the potential to unite people from all races. Images provide the possibility of having transparent conversations about internal beliefs and biases. These conversations must take place for real revolutionary action to happen.

Project Ideas:
In thinking about my research interests, I believe I want to start looking at the photographs and images that tell the story of Black men in education. I may create this based on historical photos that have been used in media, cinema, across generates, etc. I think it would be interesting to share these images with Black male teachers and see what emotions arise from them.

Dora Trujillo Entry #4-Vulnerable Voices Not Heard

Sorry for the late post.

I found the article Pregnant Bodies, Fertile Minds: Gender, Race, and the Schooling of Pregnant Teens by Wendy Luttrell a little problematic. This exploration of self in which pregnant teenage girls confront the lack of representation, internalized racism and awareness of selfhood, spoke to me of systematic racism and classism in which individuals — and not a lack of equity in the distribution of resources —  are blamed for their circumstances.

There were several themes in this article that struck a chord with me as a Latina. One was when Luttrell discusses Marisa’s attachment to the land. This attachment is made manifest by Marisa in her sadness about “her lost freedom of movement” (2003). How we connect to the land is also connected to our self-perception. Marisa alludes to this attachment by comparing the constrictions of living in an U.S. Northeastern city to the freedom of movement of living in a Mexican city. I wonder if Marisa saw herself as limited also by the new culture of the U.S. I was born and spent my whole childhood and adolescence in Medellin, a city seated deep in the Andes. When you step outside your home, you are surrounded by mountains. The connection between mountains and the people born in this region is immense. We are proud to be called montañeros — mountain people. I remember going back to Medellin to visit family and having tears rolling down my cheeks when I caught a glimpse of the Andes. I had not known that I missed them so much, and I finally understand why I love to go to the mountains –any mountain will do.

While reading these chapters, I often wondered how painful it was for these young girls to answer Luttrell’s question, “Who am I?” (2003). It couldn’t be easy for these young women to face their realities — lack of representation and internalized racism — and to “[grow] up hard and fast” (2003). Luttrell discusses the psychological scars of growing up ‘hard.’ I wonder how the girls felt when they discussed their self-portraits and their collages in front of someone who did not represent them as women of color and immigrants. Did they just comply because it was all they knew when most teachers were white and middle-class? Or did they rebel by only giving the bare minimum? I wonder how their exploration of self-hood and participation impacts who their audience is.            

The article ‘A camera is a big responsibility’: a lens for analyzing children’s visual voices by Wendy Luttrell, discusses a mode of visual research in which children’s voices are not obscured by adult interpretations. My question is, how can the adult researcher in her analysis allow for her co-researchers/participants’ voices to be heard without illuminating or obscuring (Tobin, 2015) the children’s narratives? Luttrell describes how children’s visual narratives in general may be dictated by the “inspecting gaze” (Foucault, 1980 in Luttrell, 2010). This echoes for me hooks’ ‘colonizing gaze’ in which marginalized groups see themselves through the lens of the power group, in this case the adults in the children’s lives. However, she argues that in these visual narratives, there may be the promise of “alternative narratives” (Luttrell, 2010). This brings to mind the promise of the “transgressive image” in which the marginalized break away from the colonizing gaze and “interrogate old narratives” (hooks, 1992). This is exemplified by Cornelio’s explanation of why he took a photograph of the family’s living room instead of his mom because she was too busy working and “waiting [for the living room] to get done” (Luttrell, 2010). Luttrell discusses how this visual narrative runs antithetical to the narrative of welfare reforms that portrays single mothers’ work ethics as lacking.

This article exemplifies for me the vulnerability of marginalized groups such as immigrant children and youth. I thought it was very courageous of these children to share their visual narratives with Luttrell and her researchers. As an immigrant Latina, I know what it is like to live under the inspecting gaze and trying to live up to it. I know that Luttrell says that there were many opportunities for the students to opt in or out of this research, but at times that desire to belong can drive you to do things that otherwise you would not agree to do. I always wonder how we, as researchers and scholars, can ensure that those who are vulnerable do not feel obligated to participate in such research but do it of their own free will.

I was struck by Luttrell’s discussion of “identity formation” and the in-between worlds immigrant children and youth live in while conforming to a new country and a new language. Immigrants know that feeling of being in limbo, in which you feel out synch with both the new culture and your own culture. In that in-between place there are incredible possibilities for subversive representations. My project is about the subversive act of imagining yourself different from the judgements behind the colonizing and inspecting gazes and interrogating these old narratives (hooks, 1992, Foucault, 1980 in Luttrell, 2010) by bringing them to the surface and holding them to the light.

The article, Children Framing Childhoods and Looking Back, also by Luttrell, emphasizes the importance of visual research with children to interrogate the old narratives, wherein children and their communities are viewed as deficient and in need of fixing by the educational system, in order to bring forth narratives that are antithetical to the old narratives of deficit.

In my project, I want to inspect these imposed narratives and see them for what they are, “internalized racism” (hooks, 1992). I found that Luttrell’s article relates to my life experience as a Latina. Latin Americans have been treated as children by European countries and the U.S., albeit with the help of the local governments. This reminds me of a passage in the book Go Set A Watchman by Harper Lee, in which the character Atticus Finch in an argument tells his daughter “the Negroes down here are still in their childhood as a people” (2015, 246). The arrogance of this statement brought forth a lot of painful memories. I went to school with Spaniard nuns, the Carmelites. They always treated us as though we did not know better. It was almost as though the Catholic Church saw us as children who did not know how to take care of themselves and so they needed to protect us from ourselves. The castes created by the Europeans, deemed scientific at the time, looked at the mixing of the “races” as diminishing the “pure” races, especially the Caucasian race. Everyone else was treated as inferior and not deserving of the entitlements that the Caucasian race enjoyed. Through these articles, I could see the possibilities of visual research to illuminate that which has been obscured by the denial of the existence of internalized racism in communities of color.

 

Amanda’s reflection 2.26

Amanda’s Reflections on 2.26

Reading Luttrell’s pieces this week I was struck by how much information a self portrait or portrait can hold. Particularly when the person is talking back to a cultural narrative about who they are and what their experiences mean. I really enjoyed how she brought in the actual conversations along with the visuals in Pregnant Bodies, Fertile Minds. It really helped me understand the collective process of inquiry that grounded her research. If anything, there were points where I wished she had brought in more of what she and the students had talked about, and I wondered if she had shared some of her overall reflections with them and whether they had had a chance to give her their interpretation. For example, when she described that the students’ depictions of romance allowed for more of their nuanced and complicated emotions than their idealized depictions of motherhood, I felt she may have been missing something here. In the comments some of the young women made about always being there for their kids, I saw a recognition of the value of that kind of support, perhaps born out of struggle. There are many interpretations, but in many of the places where she related some of the specifics of their classroom experiences to theoretical work I wished there was more of a voice from the students.

Still, much of what she wrote was powerful to me. I decided this week to look back at Nancy Borowick’s photography, the young woman who lost both her parents to cancer. I wanted to see what portraits can say in the context and themes I’m exploring. I found a great picture below she took of her mom. In this photo, I see slowness and humor in the midst of cultural narratives of fear. I see someone being really unique in the midst of cultural narratives that others people who are sick.

As I reflected more this week on my project, I continued thinking about how I might use lines to explore my experience of finding, loosing, finding again connection in loss. I thought about what material would these lines be. Would they be a significant fabric to me, something I chose because of its aesthetics or something that is perhaps just plain white? Would I write something on these lines? I thought of perhaps writing questions I’ve been asking myself throughout our class as I’ve looked at these photographs. I also thought of writing different significant pieces of my life story and my family’s life story and intertwining them. Visually representing the ways in which we take on each other’s stories, how the stories continue and change through the generations, what it means to shift from hearing stories to telling the stories. I thought I could also play with the fabric itself (fraying, weaving it, etc) to express more about the experience of seeking roots and connection in loss.  I wondered if I would want the fabric to loop around something, climb up something, and if it would make an overall design or not.

Lisa Millsaps_ Reflection on Week 5 Readings

This week I would like to mostly reflect on Wendy Luttrell’s Pregnant Bodies, Fertile Minds Chapter 3 reading in my post. Tara represents many of the young ladies that I meet with as a college administrator, pregnant or have had several children for many reasons and are just simply trying to finish their courses to complete their Bachelor’s degree without considering longevity as a career woman, self-worth and value in society. They experience difficulty managing conflicting emotions which are highlighted in the girls’ debate over their self-portraits ( Luttrell). It reminds me of the interactions that I have with students who are interested in returning back to college or throughout their college experience that is struggling with their own identities, family, career choices, and hardships of life as pregnant mothers.

The stories that are submitted to my office at work that I read in my position as a Readmission Coordinator for at-risk students, who suddenly left the college or were academically dismissed, are almost identical to the high school pregnant students in the chapter reading.

I am saddened to read that with all of the resources that are available to students outside of poverty-stricken high schools that students still resort to participate in at-risk behaviors that lead to pregnancy and sexually transmitted infection/diseases.  The student poverty, especially in our inner-city schools, is disheartening. Our school communities need to do more to keep our students more occupied with enriched activities that build self-confidence, self-worth, and a family within the school community to remain encouraged about future self-worth, career readiness, and identity as a mother into adulthood in society.

 

The ethnographic studies highlighted in Wendy Luttrell’s articles this week aim to not only give voice to marginalized children and young people, but to treat them as “knowing subjects” and to gain through photography and visual arts a more rich understanding of their lives, thoughts, and intentions. It calls to mind Pink’s view of anthropology of participant as researcher (Pink, 2011), by learning in as part of. In Luttrell’s articles, the artists were respected as knowledge holders and afforded an opportunity to edit, discuss, and learn from each other throughout the process, so as not to be exploited through their art. Allowing the student/participant/researcher ultimate curatorial authority is an important way to give power and realign inherent power structures of teacher/research and student/participant as researcher.

It is also notable that these research studies are not intended to draw quantitative conclusions, but to provide deeper meanings and understanding through multimodal means of human expression. The artist’s decisions to expose, omit, emphasize, and subtly or unconsciously reveal all speak to the child’s individual and nuanced lived experience that may not be readily expressed through language or other modes. To reach these interpretations without “adultism” creeping in and shading the art is important to maintain the integrity of the child’s voice (Luttrell, 2016).

Luttrell’s research speaks to the overwhelmingly oppressive hegemony within our society, and the far-reaching consequences of these structures through the lives of children in our schools. This is clearly represented in “A camera is a big responsibility” Figure 1 (the lens for viewing children’s meaning making through photography). At the center of this lens is the “Child as knowing subject”. It is center because it is the most important aspect of this lens, the one with the most individuality. Spreading outward in larger and larger concentric circles are underlying structures that inform the child as knowing subject. The largest, most oppressive band is “Larger Social Forces”, hegemony. There is a beautiful representation of children pushing back against this oppression, highlighting “exchanges between children where pictures served as means for them to both uphold and reject social differences between themselves and their peers” (Luttrell, 2016). In many ways, children are far more righteous than adults and they deserve to have their voices heard and represented in art.

There is an incredible amount of first person dialogue and personal stories in Luttrell’s writings, and I felt intrusive reading it, even though identities are protected. In the article “Pregnant bodies, fertile minds”, there is a moment where a pregnant teenager named Michelle is dealing with the “empty space” in her art piece. She accidentally, yet revealingly, says “I need something to fill me, I mean, this space up.” Michelle decides to fill up the empty space with cut-out hearts.  I mention this because it is clear these research projects are used for all parties involved to gain deeper insight and greater understanding through expression, dialogue, and an exploration of self within society. An activity in self-representation with all that encompasses.

With my own project, I am working on the underlying frameworks that my artwork will rely upon. I am collecting data from the 2010 census and compiling a spreadsheet while also trying to hone my tracing skills with the help of a glass window in my house. I am keenly aware of Gene’s fear that my map will be too literal, which is why I want multiple iterations of the map, each one perhaps getting more abstract. I have yet to put paint to paper, but I will soon, once the census data analysis is complete. In class, Gene ventured that my map would look like a checkerboard, but after looking at most of the data, it appears the map will look more like a few black areas in a sea of white.

“It is only be becoming more fully aware that we begin to see clearly.” (bell hooks, 1992)

bell hooks writes about colonization when referring to social representations of blacks in film, tv, and narratives within our lives. This colonization exists all throughout society in hidden and visible threads of life and certainly is present in the segmented and segregated way many of our towns, cities, and schools are run. I read this article the same weekend I saw Black Panther in the theatre and it is sobering to think about how anomalous this movie is (one with an all-black cast that embraces African knowledge, power, and culture).

In terms of my own project, an investigation of the redlining in Long Island towns and community, this reading spoke to the need for me to become “more fully aware”. I am aware of my privilege as a white male and I want to be cognisant of decisions I make so as to not further the imperialist and colonialist mentality. I know there are areas where I am perpetrating this mentality yet not aware of.

This weekend, I listened to a podcast by Reveal (The Center For Investigative Reporting) which highlighted how banks deny mortgages to people of color in order to keep those people out of certain neighborhoods. Banks refused to admit this, but the stories and data offer stark proof of this racism. My multimedia post for this week is the website that Reveal helped create: a searchable map that documents the lending disparities amongst people to get a home mortgage.

http://apps.revealnews.org/redlining/

My own project is beginning to take shape in my own mind as well. I will create a map of Long Island towns and communities painted over with black, white, and red paint. The color of the town or community will be determined by the majority ethnicity as determined by the 2010 census. The borders between the towns will be painted in start red paint. I am currently going through the data to get a clear idea of home ownership ethnicity in each town.  The goal of these colors is to evoke an emotional reaction. Clearly separating the towns in black or white, for me, evokes Jim Crow segregation in clear and dangerous ways. The Red border (all borders are permeable) is passionate, violent, deadly, and for some, lovely. There will be other layers within this painting, but I am not yet sure what shape they will take.

 

 

Lauren’s Journal Entry 3

The artist’s pursuit to challenge and transform the status quo rests on Bell Hook’s compelling argument for the transgressive image. According to Hook, the real work begins with “creating alternatives, asking ourselves questions about what types of images subvert, pose critical alternatives and transform our worldviews and move us away from dualistic thinking about good and bad.” Representation comes from an understanding of collective history and the perspective from which we create. This is timely, as I’ve read through a multitude of reactions to the recent unveiling of President Obama’s and First Lady Michelle Obama’s portraits. I am particularly interested in Baltimore painter Amy Sherald’s representation of Michelle Obama and her decision to paint the First Lady’s skin in grey tones. Skin color, a traditional form of race identification, was completely excluded (https://www.newyorker.com/culture/annals-of-appearances/the-mystery-of-amy-sheralds-portrait-of-michelle-obama). In terms of the Hook reading, I wonder what this says about the political perspective from which the artist paints. In my interpretation, by devaluing skin color and ultimately stripping away the racial charge, it renders the “white” narrative powerless. Sherald still taps into the collective black past, however, in other ways such as the geometric shapes on Michelle Obama’s dress that remind the artist of quilt making artisans in Alabama.

       

I’m not sure if there are transformational representations of undocumented migrant youth at this point but the readings this week have opened the avenue for exploration. Thus far, the perspective largely communicates a narrative of the oppressed laborer (i.e. Alto Arizona Art Campaign Poster) or the law-breaking, wall-hopping runner (i.e. Michael Wells, Collaborating Photographer of The Land of Open Graves). This is important for me to look at this critically because young adults in my project may need to select images to be the descriptors of their experience and identity. Do the available images retell the same oppressed narrative or are we forced to create the alternative image?

Brown reading and reflection 2

Doing Visual and Arts-Based Research
UED 75200
Professor Gene Fellner ([email protected])
Spring 2018
Wednesday 6:30-8:30
Shawn Brown
2/19/2018

The image of the artist was telling. I can see myself in this image. His appearance is similar to what I regularly wear when feel safe. When in different settings I change my presentation to ensure that the people around do not feel threatened by my clothing. The fact that a book was created to help Negros stay safe while traveling is telling of the violence that America had inflicted on Blacks historically.

“It was widely used at a time when African Americans were navigating physical and social mobility through the swamp of Jim Crow laws and attitudes in the mid 20th century”. The artist brings this navigation to life visually and physically. He desires to place the audience in the shoes of a Black motorist to experience, the joy, anxiety, fear, and confusion one may feel in this space. Being able to get a glimpse of the American dream, yet remaining bound by “barriers, and accessibility, and obstacles, and perseverance”.

The artwork is telling of a historical narrative of racism and violence in America. I think of the number of hangings that must of have taken place to birth such a map. I think of how many lives were ravished to structure this map. I envision the roads lined with the blood of Blacks seeking freedom. Making this information emotional to me is dependent on the viewer and their knowledge of segregation and lynchings in the south after emancipation. The map has roadways and paths that represented possible neutral areas that weren’t slumped in violence. Roads were among the country’s few unsegregated spaces. When trying to find lodging from their travels, Blacks had few options. Most businesses closed their doors.

Living in 2018 I can say that little has changed. The rules are different, but the level of violence and racism continues to this day. I believe the only difference is technology and our ability to see what has been happening to Black motorists all along. I have witnessed, a 70-year-old man killed when reaching for identification, another died in front of his child, another when running away, a man’s spine broken in half, etc. etc. The creator of this map spoke of a time when the map will be obsolete. Sadly, I think a map, app, website, group chat, and online community needs to be developed for Black motorists in 2018.

Black Looks

Equitable representation of Blacks has always been a challenge in mass media. With this challenge comes an added layer of misogyny that always seems to take a back seat. White supremacy lives within the hearts of all ethnic groups. The most conscious Black person has been engulfed in a racist, sexist world of imagery by way of mass media. Minor interventions have led to insignificant changes. Revolution does not take place only through conversations without regulations to support these interventions. To create a dialog about the experiences of Black people language must be developed that is universally understood. Violence, hate, pain, and love are universal experiences that everyone comprehends. When considering Black people, we (society) has modified these experiences because of the dehumanization of the entire race. As James Baldwin states, “There has been no language to describe the horrors of Black life.” We must undeviatingly, transparently acknowledge that mass media intentionally produces images to support, “White supremacy, a patriarchy structure, oppression, exploitation, and overall domination of a race.” The importance of controlling these images is apparent in every commercial, blockbuster film, and sitcom. Growing up watching these films, I have become conditioned to label certain images as good or bad based on my subconscious experiences with imagery. “What is considered to be good is often a reaction to representation created by white people” The misrepresentation races and gender are
The binary of remembering the past and creating a new future is a challenge for Black spectators. It makes viewing any form of media problematic. One has to avoid gazing at glaring inequalities in representation. Black women explicitly have to deal not only with issues of race but also gender equity.

My personal experiences viewing the portrayal of Black men and women in cinema has evolved. The more that I learn about the underlying messages and goals of white supremacy, the less I can enjoy a night at the movies. As a child, I was enamored by superheroes. Superman, Batman, and the uncanny X-men were my favorite. When I began to look closely at the villain’s character, color, and features, I realized subtle supremacist coding. In movies, cartoons, and sitcoms, I started to see many similarities. The one television show that I still enjoy is The Cosby Show, and It’s a Different World. Even within those sitcoms, the undertone of male dominance resonates. I think of possible solutions to the cancer of racism/sexism in media. I believe that a counter-narrative by way of imagery is needed. We must intentionally and consistently ensure that images of Black men women are used in mass media in an impartial manner.

Bibliography

“Black Looks: Race and Representation: Bell Hooks: 9780896084339: Amazon.Com: Books.” Accessed February 19, 2018. https://www.amazon.com/Black-Looks-Representation-Bell-Hooks/dp/0896084337.
“How an Artist Learned About Freedom From ‘The Negro Motorist Green Book’ – The New York Times.” Accessed February 19, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/19/arts/design/how-an-artist-learned-about-freedom-from-the-negro-motorist-green-book.html.